12.12.09

Pygmalion quickly unscultped the female nude
that was coming to life...



















...what he really needed was a fast horse.

My apologies to Sir 
Edward Coley Burne-Jones.


13 comments:

  1. Pygmalion must've known...hence the deconstruction?

    ReplyDelete
  2. To my eye....(which may not be saying much)...the nude in that painting is strikingly out of proportion. The head appears too small for the body and the legs too long. The head even appears as though it could be male.

    Does anyone else see this? Or do I need to shut down the computer and go back to bed? ;o)

    ReplyDelete
  3. Harnett-Hargrove, I'm glad to meet you! I love to meet fellow artists and will look around at your work. Thanks for stopping by my blog!

    Jai

    ReplyDelete
  4. AngelMay, I agree that the head does look a little odd and could be male if looked at alone.

    Jai

    ReplyDelete
  5. nice. this one gave me a bit of a chuckle...and an elbow from my wife...

    ReplyDelete
  6. I just don't think they had any idea how to see nudes and pick up all the nuances then. Art has grown in the nude depiction since. She looks distinctly uncomfortable adn ot of place in that setting.

    ReplyDelete
  7. deconstruct... reconstruct that is what we do...
    still, I got a chuckle..

    ReplyDelete
  8. I mean it's all opinion, but some of you must be familiar with the Pre-Raphaelite painting style? -J

    ReplyDelete
  9. Looks like Paris Hilton on a first date! haha!

    ReplyDelete
  10. the model also could be have been a young man.
    i see no woman-hips and the legs are those of a man:))

    ReplyDelete
  11. Haha...Love this!

    I have a wonderful framed etching of Pygmalion sculpting the female.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Birmingham has the largest collection of preraphaelite paintings in the uk. Its a delight to sed them in person.

    ReplyDelete